How to prepare your climate data for SEC and CSRD audit requirements

header image for a blog on audit preparation for climate data. A photo of workers looking at windmills and an image of a stack of papers

The upcoming Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s climate disclosure rule in the US and the recently-finalized Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in Europe both require mandatory carbon footprint disclosures from most large companies. Under these regulations, footprint data will be disclosed alongside financial statements, and must be treated with the same level of rigor.

Under the SEC rule as it’s currently written, large public filers will be required to provide—with attestation—limited assurance on the accuracy and completeness of their scope 1 and 2 emissions starting in 2024, followed by reasonable assurance in 2026 and beyond. Assurance is an assessment of the quality from a third-party auditor, and attestation refers to the auditor’s sign-off on the assurance findings.

Here, “limited” and “reasonable” follow the same distinction used in financial accounting and are a matter of depth: limited assurance tests a small sample, while reasonable assurance goes deep across the data review process. CSRD disclosures will also require auditing.

As we move toward more standardized and mandatory reporting on climate, high-quality carbon accounting is critical to business success. Companies will need to treat climate data with the same precision as financial data.

Successfully doing this starts with implementing strong internal controls: measures that ensure data accuracy, completeness, validity, and security. It also requires quality data governance—an overall management framework for climate data and the measurement process.

This guide is our blueprint for navigating the challenges many organizations face when they take this on, with a focus on how companies can maintain audit-ready rigor throughout the emissions measurement process.

Challenge 1: Complex data sources

Carbon accounting relies on a multitude of data sources from teams across a company, including facilities, human resources, and finance. Some of these sources require manual data collection, which can make setting up control systems a difficult task.

chart showing the teams involved in preparing climate data for SEC rules

There are three common ways to collect data from multiple sources:

Challenge 2: Implementing and testing internal controls

Companies must establish a systematic process for implementing and testing internal controls over carbon accounting, focusing on four key components:

  1. Risk assessment: Identify the key risks associated with the carbon accounting process, such as data inaccuracies, estimation uncertainties, and non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
  2. Control design: Design and implement control activities to mitigate the identified risks. These could include automated data checks, reconciliation procedures, review and approval workflows, and segregation of duties.
  3. Control testing: Regularly test the effectiveness of the internal controls, including walkthroughs, inspections, and inquiry-based procedures. This helps organizations identify potential weaknesses and areas for improvement.
  4. Monitor and report: Establish a continuous monitoring process to track the performance of the internal controls, and report the results to relevant stakeholders, such as the audit committee and senior management.

Challenge 3: Meeting tough external audit deadlines

The reporting deadlines for carbon accounting, as set by the SEC and CSRD, will determine the timeline for external audits of an organization's carbon footprint. Some helpful strategies to have your reports ready and data audited in time include:

How to meet these challenges and prepare your climate program for audits:

Implement climate software with enterprise-grade features

Powerful enterprise-grade features can make or break the integrity of your data, your governance processes, and stakeholder collaboration. Look for these features: 

  1. Intuitive design with collaboration features and fine-grained access controls: Users can easily upload data onto the platform and include any unique context needed to process it.
  2. Ingest data from your system of record: Direct integration enables you to remove manual data export from your measurement process to greatly reduce the chance of human error.
  3. Audit trails: Detailed logs of all data uploads, transformations, and assumptions to provide full transparency for your internal and external auditors.
  4. Anomaly detection: Automatic detection of data anomalies to validate ingested data and ensure accuracy, plus the ability to review data with subject matter experts and approve it before incorporating it into your measurement.

Prepare for what’s next

While preparing for audit and disclosure can be daunting, a holistic approach will enable you to take the next step: climate action. A comprehensive platform will produce a measurement that’s granular and accurate enough to drive strategic business decisions.

By addressing the challenges of data complexity, meeting the growing demand for rigor, fostering cross-functional collaboration, and carefully planning the implementation and testing of internal controls, you can position your business for success in this new era of carbon accounting.

In doing so, you’ll address regulatory requirements in tandem with advancing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change. If Watershed can help you take these steps, get in touch.

Stay up to date

Get the latest from Watershed, from policy updates to in-depth climate guides.


an image of the CSRD experts who spoke at Watershed's webinar

Tactical advice on the CSRD

Photo of UK flag on the left and TPT logo on the right

TPT: Everything you need to know about the UK Transition Plan Taskforce

Illustration of coins in a field

SEC ESG fund rules: Everything you need to know

Customer stories

coyuchi product

How Coyuchi gets product-level carbon insights from Watershed

houses next to solar panels

How Aon automated its carbon footprint measurement

kroll and watershed and cdp logos

Kroll on using Watershed to save time reporting to CDP

Watershed HQ

Sylvie Goulard, a new member of Watershed's Policy Advisory Board

Welcoming Sylvie Goulard to our Policy Advisory Board

Climate curve with text "Series C"

$100M for climate

2023 with a world for the 0

Watershed's 2023 year in review


Illustration of coins in a field

SEC ESG fund rules: Everything you need to know

the California capitol where SB253 and SB261 were passed

California SB 253 and SB 261: a guide for companies

Welcoming Mary Schapiro to the Watershed Policy Advisory Board

Welcoming Mary Schapiro to our Policy Advisory Board


watershed and latham and watkins law firm logos next to an image of the SEC

How to prepare for mandatory climate disclosure - advice from Betty M. Huber of Latham & Watkins

ropes and grey logo with the California flag, watershed logo and text: Guide

Michael Littenberg of Ropes & Gray on California’s SB 253 and 261

EU Flag plus Covington logo

What is the EU's Green Claims Directive? Full Guide with Covington experts